7/2/2023 0 Comments Joan of arc pernoudThe foreword says that the original thesis has been cut in places, but further pruning would not seriously have damaged the analysis. The bibliography is comprehensive, to put it mildly the list of printed material, primary and secondary, extends to over 100 pages. 349), occupying twenty lines of text, with notes which are almost exclusively biographies. This prosopographical approach is at its extreme at pages 350-354: a single sentence consisting of a list of names (which actually starts on p. These are clearly necessary and central to the genealogical analysis they also appear regularly elsewhere, especially when discussing the people associated with the pope. The scale of the referencing often appears excessive, if not self-indulgent-but it does mean that the notes are potentially also extremely useful in other areas. The volume is massively-indeed, dauntingly and overwhelmingly-documented: footnotes must account for at least half of the printed area of the main text. In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Ħ20BOOK REVIEWS Vones certainly aims to be exhaustive, especially in his referencing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |